Preloader
Brandon Koh

Brandon Koh

CV

Lecturer, Singapore University of Social Sciences


Biography


Dr. Brandon Koh is a Lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences. He received his Ph.D. in Psychology at the Singapore Management University in 2019. To date, he has published eight peer-refereed journal articles and book chapters at reputable outlets, including top-tier journals such as the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, and Journal of Organizational Behavior. Brandon was awarded the Presidential Doctoral Fellowship Award 2018-2019, which recognizes the top 5% Ph.D. Candidates for their excellence in teaching and research outputs. Brandon’s research focuses on motivation, creativity, and culture. He is also very passionate about teaching, particularly on the topics of research methods and statistics. Brandon also strongly advocates for effective, concise, and accurate communication of science to the general public. Attesting to these speaking abilities, he was the winner of Singapore’s first nationwide 3-Minute Thesis competition, and represented Singapore at the 2017 Asia-Pacific 3MT competition. Brandon was the first Ph.D. candidate invited to speak on Singapore’s TEDx stage, at TEDxNTU 2017.

Research Projects

A Time for Creativity

Have you ever imagined what the future will look like 50 years from now? In my research, I discovered that thinking about the future can enhance our creativity. Truly creative ideas are often extremely rare, and the pervasive reliance on schemas is one of the strongest barriers to creativity. But what if we could replace our creativity-limiting schemas with a creativity-facilitating one? I discovered that people’s future-oriented schemas are inundated with expectation of change and progress. If activated, these schemas shape people’s creative ideas to enhance their originality.
Learn more about this research from my TEDxNTU 2017 talk, “A Time for Creativity”

Busyness can be Useful for You

How’re you feeling today? “Busy” is fast replacing “Good” in our everyday exchanges. The modern world has become immersed in a culture of busyness. Increasingly, people report more stress and time-crunch, yet simultaneously extols busy individuals as highly competent and in-demand.

However, do people actually want to feel busy, and are these emotions useful for them? The intuitive answer is no, busyness is an unpleasant emotion associated with high workloads. Some will even link it to exhaustion, stress, and workaholism.

Yet, busyness could be an emotion useful for us. From an instrumental emotional regulation perspective, people sometimes wish to feel emotions that are useful rather than pleasant. For example, some people want to feel angry, which actually helps them perform better in competitive situations. Sadness has also been linked to enhanced cognitive performance.

Busyness could block out distraction and energize persistence, or it could lead to stress and reduced performance. It turns out that our preference for busyness differentiates how busyness will affect us.

My research indicates that people with a higher preference for busyness actively seek out busier situations, and exhibit better cognitive performance when workloads are higher. However, those averse to feeling busy do poorly under pressure, even though they perform just as well when workloads are low.

This autonomous pursuit of busyness is also differentiated from workaholism, which did not show similar performance benefits. Importantly, this changes the narrative that high levels of work engagement does not necessarily mean workaholism, which had previously been linked to burnout and health problems. Recognizing that preference for busyness can be autonomous rather than compulsive and that it can lead to positive benefits fills an important research gap in our increasingly busy societies.

If you are not too busy, or if you are, read more about this research here.

Other research

Together with his Former Ph.D. advisor, Dr. Angela Leung and members of the MC3 Lab, Brandon also remains actively involved in research in Environmental Psychology and the Psychology of Paradox.

Selected Publication

For the full list of publication, presentation and awards, please refer to CV

Leung, A. K.-y., Liou, S., Miron-Spektor, E., Koh, B., Chan, D., Eisenberg, R., & Schneider, I. (2018). Middle ground approach to paradox: Within- and between-culture examination of the creative benefits of paradoxical frames. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 443-464.
https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000160

Koh, B., & Leung, A. K.-y. (2019). A time for creativity: How future-oriented schemas facilitate creativity. In A. K.-y. Leung, L. Y-Y. Kwan, & S. Liou (Eds.),Culture and creativity: Basic processes and applied innovations (pp. 3-33). New York: Oxford University Press
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103816

Lee, S. T. H., Hartanto, A., Yong, J., Koh, B., & Leung, A. K.-y. (2019). Examining the CrossCultural Validity of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) between an Asian (Singaporean) Sample and a Western (American) Sample. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23 109-116.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12390

Leung, A. K.-y., & Koh, B.(2019). The role of culture in theories of creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103816

Leung, A. K.-y., & Koh, B. (2019). Psychological science of multiculturalism. In S. Kitayama, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd edition). New York: Guilford.

Tsai, M. H., & Wee, S., & Koh, B. (2019). Inter-rater calibration training versus frame-of- reference training and its effects on rater consistency and accuracy.Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 40(6), 740-757.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.353

Leung, A. K.-y., Liou, S., Tsai, M-H., & Koh, B. (2019). Mood-creativity relationship in groups: The role of equality in idea contribution in temporal mood effects.Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 165-183.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.353

Leung, A. K.-y.,Koh, B. (2019). Understanding pro-environmental intentions by integrating insights from social mobility, cosmopolitanism, and social dominance.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 213-222.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12348

Leung, A. K.-y., Koh, B., & Lee, S. (in press). Culture and creativity in multicultural teams. In Oxford research encyclopaedia of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press